Home Blog Page 31

EXCLUSIVE – SHANE FILAN’S HIGH COURT DEBT BATTLE

This story was first published in the Irish Mail on Sunday on 01/04/2012

Michael O’Farrell
Investigations Editor
Bank of Ireland is suing Westlife’s Shane Filan over alleged unpaid debts, the Irish Mail on Sunday can reveal.

Documents lodged in the High Court show that BoI is pursuing cases against the star and two members of his family, Finbarr and Peter.

BoI was one of several banks that helped fund Shane’s massive property speculations during the boom, which aimed to create a number of housing and commercial developments in Leitrim and Mayo.

On Monday, the bank was given permission by the High Court to fast-track the case – and also to serve summonses on Shane’s agents or family, in the wake of his move to Britain three months ago.

Although Westlife continue to post profits as a band, Mr Filan’s property ambitions are in disarray with his main vehicle – Shafin Developments Ltd – selling off houses at less than they cost to build.

On the move: Shane Filan and wife Gillian are now living in Surrey

On the move: Shane Filan and wife Gillian are now living in Surrey

During the boom, Shafin also purchased several sites in Sligo, where further ambitious developments were planned.

But the company, which borrowed millions from Ulster Bank, has failed to progress the sites despite obtaining planning permission for some of them.

The Filans also embarked on further property ventures funded by other banks such as Anglo Irish Bank.

Along the way, Shane and family members gave personal guarantees of almost €5m.

In 2007, the Filans used Anglo to fund the purchase of a substantial hotel site in Dromahair, Co. Leitrim, to be redeveloped as a supermarket. Today this site still lies idle despite having full planning.

At the same time – the peak of the property bubble – Bank of Ireland also afforded loans to Shane, Finbarr and Peter Filan.

The first loan, in December 2007, was used to purchase an old bakery in the centre of Ballina, Co. Mayo, which was to be demolished and rebuilt as a high-street fashion outlet.

The project has not proceeded despite being granted full planning permission.

The second BoI loan was used to purchase – for €1.3m in 2009 – 58 hectares of idyllic Leitrim farmland and a stretch of nearby mountainside where Shane and his brothers keep horses.

A year ago, the MoS revealed that Shane and Finbarr Filan narrowly missed having Shafin struck off for failing to file accounts for more than a year. When the accounts were finally filed they detailed accumulated losses of just over €3m in 2010 – a quarter of a million euro more than in 2009.

The company is also carrying bank debts of almost €5m and is entirely dependent on the ‘continued support of its directors and its bankers’.

But in correspondence with the MoS, the Filans insisted they would not go bust.

‘They have strong commercially viable plans for all of their projects and are prepared for the eventual upturn in the economy. They are looking forward to the rest of 2011 and 2012 in a positive manner,’ their solicitor said.

The Filans also promised that work on a huge retail and residential development on land just behind Shane’s Carraroe home would begin within months. The lawyer said: ‘They plan to commence construction this summer. When opened, this project will generate between 90 and 110 full-time jobs.’

Today the site still lies idle.

Farewell: Filan and bandmates Mark Feehily, Kian Egan and Nicky Byrne are soon set to embark on their final tour
Farewell: Filan and bandmates Mark Feehily, Kian Egan and Nicky Byrne are soon set to embark on their final tour

The revelation that Shane faces High Court action over his debts comes as Westlife prepare for their farewell tour.

The tour is expected to be lucrative but the band’s companies do not appear to be holding the kind of resources Shane would need to fund his struggling property deals.

Westlife’s main entertainment company, Bluenet Ltd, posted accumulated profits of €49,000 in 2010. Another Westlife company, Blacknight Ltd, which generates revenue from broadcast licence income, posted a profit of €6,054.

In August, Shane’s wife Gillian resigned as a director of a number of companies owned by Shane and Finbarr.

How did millionaire Westlife star Shane end up being sued over ‘bank debt’?

By Michael O’farrell

To the outside world, Shane Filan has it all. As an idolised member of Westlife, he appears the epitome of the millionaire pop star, complete with the trophy homes, stables of horses and a fleet of fast cars.

In keeping with this image, he famously treated himself to the mother of all rock star indulgences for his 30th birthday –the original silver Aston Martin driven by Sean Connery in the James Bond film Goldfinger.

This month, the hugely successful band completed a groundbreaking Chinese tour and in June, Westlife’s final farewell tour will culminate in back-to-back, sold-out shows in Croke Park.

Icon: Sean Connery with the James Bond Austin Martin that Shane Filan has sold for ¿400,000
Icon: Sean Connery with the James Bond Austin Martin that Shane Filan has sold for ¿400,000

With such success, Filan should have little to worry about financially. But he does – if legal moves just initiated by Bank of Ireland are anything to go by.

Filan, who moved his family to Britain three months ago, auctioned off the Bond car last September, reportedly receiving €398,000 for the sale.

But an MoS investigation into his business affairs indicates that Filan’s varied attempts at turning a profit from speculative property development have failed to result in any cash yields.

Instead, they appear to have proved disastrous, resulting in vacant development sites and mounting debt, sometimes secured on Filan’s life insurance and other personal guarantees worth millions.

Filan first began to engage in speculative building in 2004 when he formed a company called Shafin Developments Ltd with his brother Finbarr.

Prospects for the firm initially looked promising and work began on a 90-unit housing estate called Stonebridge in the picturesque ­Leitrim village of Drom­ahair.

With construction funded by loans from Ulster Bank, the first homes went under the hammer for €300,000-plus – just as the property frenzy was beginning to reach a crescendo.

The Stonebridge development featured on RTÉ’s Showhouse series, which allowed professional designers plan the interior of two identical new houses and have the public vote on which was the better design.

The show was broadcast on May 4, 2006, just as the property bubble was about to burst.

High hopes: Shane and Finbarr Filan
High hopes: Shane and Finbarr Filan

To date, just over 50 houses have been completed and when the Irish Mail on Sunday visited the site on Thursday, several were still for sale or lying vacant.

Units that once fetched €300,000 are now available for less than half that amount. According to Shafin’s latest company accounts, this means that they are now being sold below cost. 

Plans to turn part of the scheme into sheltered accommodation for elderly people also appear to have stalled – and part-completed foundations were clearly visible on the deserted parts of the site this week.

Separately from this development, Shafin also has two further Ulster Bank mortgages registered against development land in Carraroe, Co. Sligo, and a number of other projects were elsewhere in the county.

Nine months ago, when the company was subject to fines for failing to file accounts on time, the MoS toured these sites and found no indication of any work taking place. All oustanding accounts have since been filed.

At the time, Shafin – which was on the verge of being struck off for failing to file accounts – denied that it would go bust.

In correspondence with the MoS, the firm insisted that work on the Carraroe site, to include ‘a neighbourhood centre, office units, private clinic, gymnasium, creche facility and 68 residential units’, would commence before the end of last summer.

In correspondence from their lawyer, the Filans insisted that their business was healthy and ‘trading ahead of expectations given the realities of the property sector generally’.

The brothers also said that ‘an anchor tenant and a range of complementary tenants have been secured’ for the planned Carraroe centre, which would create 110 jobs upon opening in 2012.

Despite these assurances, no work has taken place. When the MoS visited the site – directly behind Shane Filan’s palatial Sligo home – on Wednesday there was no sign whatsoever that any work had begun. Instead, a handful of horses grazed peacefully on fields that have remained untouched since this time last year.

Greenfield: Shops, flats, a clinic and a pub were planned for Carraroe in Sligo
Greenfield: Shops, flats, a clinic and a pub were planned for Carraroe in Sligo

On Wednesday and Thursday, the MoS also checked a series of other Filan projects that were scheduled to begin years ago. All of them have yet to be commenced.

These include a planned 80-bed nursing home behind Sligo’s Lisroyan House that received planning permission in 2009; and a planned supermarket on the site of a disused hotel in Dromahair.

Shane and Finbarr Filan bought the hotel site, on the village’s main street, for a figure understood to be €800,000. An Anglo Irish Bank mortgage was registered against the property in 2007.

The nursing home site is understood to have been purchased for a cash price in excess of €2m. The firm also had plans to build a mixed-use development in Ballinode, close to the Sligo Institute of Technology on a site currently occupied by a food factory making HB products.

Shafin obtained planning on the site, which it does not yet own, and is still understood to be in negotiations about purchasing the premises.

As recently as last week, Shafin lodged a new deed of charge in favour of Ulster Bank over some of the land that was to be used for the original Dromahair housing estate.

Derelict: This bakery in Ballina was to be demolished
Derelict: This bakery in Ballina was to be demolished

This brings to five the number of charges Ulster Bank has over Shafin properties – and according to the company’s last accounts, the firm was carrying bank debts of €5m and was entirely ‘dependent on the continued support of its directors and bankers.’

Shafin posted accumulated losses of just over €3m in 2010 –  a quarter of a million euro more than the year before.

Security held by the banks includes a personal guarantee to Shafin Developments itself in the sum of €1.115m from an unspecified person, and un­specified personal guarantees to Ulster Bank from the directors for the sums of €2.6m, €800,000 and €1.875m.

It is not known which directors are liable for which amounts, and the Filans have declined to answer questions as to who is liable for what.

But the most immediate problem for the Filan brothers relates to alleged debts with Bank of Ireland.

And if court action just initiated by the bank is anything to go, by these problems will hit home very soon.

The case was lodged in the High Court on March 7 by Harrison O’Dowd solicitors, representing Bank of Ireland.

The bank was granted leave by the High Court to serve a special fast-track summons on Shane Filan, Finbarr Filan and another family member, Peter (Shane Filan’s brother and father are both named Peter.) No solicitor has yet come on record for the Filans.

Wild: Shafin got permission to build on the grounds of Lisroyan House, Sligo
Wild: Shafin got permission to build on the grounds of Lisroyan House, Sligo

Last Monday, the bank applied to the court and was granted permission to serve the summons through a third party rather than directly to any of the Filans themselves – a procedure that becomes necessary when there is reason to believe that the subjects of a summons cannot be reached directly.

It is possible that this was necessary because Shane and his wife, Gillian, moved from their Sligo home to a new residence in Britain three months ago.

Their English home in Cobham, in the Surrey stockbroker belt south of London, cost £1.8m (€2.2m) in 2007 and was funded by a Lloyds TSB mortgage.

Shortly before the move, Gillian resigned as a director of a number of property companies owned by Shane and Finbarr.

The resignation took effect from the end of November 2011.

The MoS has confirmed with the High Court that the Bank of Ireland action is ‘related to debt’, but it is not yet known which alleged debts are involved.

But the MoS has confirmed that at the height of the property bubble Shane, Finbarr and Peter Filan obtained two Bank of Ireland loans.

The first loan, in December 2007, was used to purchase an old bakery in the centre of Ballina, Co. Mayo, which was to be demolished and developed as a high street fashion outlet.

The project has not proceeded, despite being granted full planning permission. When the MoS visited the premises  on Wednesday, it was boarded up and is considered an eyesore by other retailers on the same street.

The second Bank of Ireland loan granted to the three Filans was used to purchase 58 hectares of idyllic Leitrim farmland and a stretch of nearby mountainside where Shane and his brothers keep horses.

This land was bought for €1.3m in 2009. When the MoS visited the location on Thursday, a number of horses were visible on the land which is located just a few kilometres from Shafin’s first housing estate project in Dromahair.

Idle: No sign of work on the site of the former Breffni Centre Hotel in Main Street, Dromahair, Co. Leitrim
Idle: No sign of work on the site of the former Breffni Centre Hotel in Main Street, Dromahair, Co. Leitrim

In addition to the case listed against the three Filans this month, a separate Bank of Ireland case against a ‘Shane Filan’ was also lodged by Bank of Ireland on January 16.

This case is also related to alleged debt and also involves a fast-track summons, although the bank is represented by a different law firm – Brian Lynch & Associates.

No law firm has yet come on record to defend the Shane Filan named in this case.

Separately from his joint Bank of Ireland investments with his family, Shane does have four rental properties in Sligo and Mayo that also have Bank of Ireland mortgages registered against them.

When the MoS checked with Filan’s lawyer in January, he said he was not aware of the listed ‘Shane Filan’ case and did not believe it related to his client.

But the sheer scale of the property portfolio with which Shane Filan is involved has naturally led to questions as to the impact that the crash has had on his personal wealth.

Already, he has witnessed ­fellow artists such as Jim Corr suffering heavy losses on property development deals.

And as they view the empty development sites that Shane and his brothers have accumulated, there are some in Sligo who are now even speculating over whether Shane’s move to Britain could have been a prelude to an application for bankruptcy in that jurisdiction.

For a man of the reputed ­success and wealth of Shane Filan, the suggestion appears unthinkable.

But until this week, the prospect that he could be sued by Bank of Ireland over alleged debts was equally preposterous.

Each and every member of Westlife must be hugely wealthy and their farewell tour will no doubt prove lucrative. But it is difficult to judge whether Shane Filan’s entertainment earnings are enough to support the millions he has poured into stalled property assets.

The latest Sunday Times entertainment rich list put the combined wealth of Westlife at €35m last year. If Filan’s share amounts to a quarter of this, he will have earned little more than €8m – a sum easily enough squandered in the bygone Celtic Tiger.

Share This:

Watchdog to investigate use of invoices by TDs after MoS revelations

This story was first published in the Irish Mail on Sunday on 18/03/2012

By: Michael O’Farrell
Investigations Editor

THE Government’s spending watchdog is to investigate the use of invoices by TDs and senators to claim expenses – almost 18 months after the Irish Mail on Sunday revealed two instances of expenses being claimed using bogus receipts.

Despite denials by the Oireachtas that its staff had ever accepted fake invoices as genuine, the use of invoices is to be reviewed by the Comptroller & Auditor General ‘for reassurance regarding the robustness of risk management’.

The move follows two years of campaign-ing by the MoS and its journalists ing by the MoS and its journalists in the wake of an August 2010 exposé, which revealed that while he was a TD, Ivor Callely claimed €3,000 in expenses using forged invoices for mobile phones.

That revelation is the subject of a Garda Fraud Squad investigation, which saw Mr Callely arrested and questioned in January.

A subsequent MoS investigation revealed that former Fianna Fáil TD Ned O’Keeffe had also submitted bogus invoices to claim Dáil expenses. Despite a complaint from a member of the public, however, the Oireachtas has never launched any investigation.

Instead, Clerk of the Dáil Kieran Coughlan allowed Mr O’Keeffe to resubmit new, equally bogus documentation.

The Oireachtas has always insisted there is ‘no question’ of the O’Keeffe expense claim being bogus. However, last week Melissa English, a parliamentary legal adviser with the Oireachtas, wrote in a letter to the MoS that Mr O’Keeffe’s expense claims werenow the focus of a Garda fraud investigation. ‘The Garda Fraud Squad has formally sought and are being provided with copies of records,’ she said.

While insisting the O’Keeffe claim is legitimate and that no bogus invoices had been accepted as genuine, the Oireachtas confirmed that Mr Coughlan had sought an outside review of the system.

The Oireachtas letter said Mr Coughlan had written to the C&AG asking him to review members’ expense transactions involving supplier invoices.

In contrast, gardaí moved to investigate as soon as they were made aware of the matter. An MoS dossier handed to gardaí includes three invoices Mr O’Keeffe submitted to claim €2,237.53 in expenses from the Oireachtas.

The invoices were on headed notepaper apparently from TR Motor Services Ltd – a respected Mercedes dealership in Harold’s Cross, Dublin. A number of irregularities on the three invoices were immediately apparent to the MoS.

The invoices appeared to have been printed on standard headed paper. When the MoS obtained a genuine invoice from TR Motors, it was markedly different to the versions submitted by Mr O’Keeffe, which had no invoice numbers. A TR Motors accounts employee said all its invoices carry such a number. Just one of the invoices bore a VAT number. And all had charged VAT at the incorrect rate of 13.5 per cent, instead of 21 per cent.

One invoice billed €330 in labour charges even though no labour is required to install the component listed. The MoS also established that TR Motors’ accounts did not show the firm having received all of the payments claimed by Mr O’Keeffe, who has always insisted the invoices are genuine.

Share This:

BREAD GIANTS RAIDED OVER ‘PRICE-FIXING’

This story was first published in the Irish Mail on Sunday on 18/03/2012

By: Debbie McCann, Michael O’Farrell

TWO of the country’s biggest bakeries have been raided in a nationwide investigation into suspected price-fixing. Brennans Bread and Irish Pride bakeries were hit by a team from the Competition Authority last week, backed up by gardaí.

Eyewitnesses said computers and paperwork were seized from Brennans’ factory in Walkinstown, Dublin, just over a week ago as staff were ordered not to move by Competition Authority staff backed up plainclothes detectives.

Colm Brennan – Brennans’ managing director – was apparently told to ‘stay put’ while the raid took place.

Brennans – Ireland’s biggest breadmaker – has refused to comment on the raids, as has Irish Pride. Sources say other bakeries are also being looked at as part of the inquiry.

A spokesman for the Competition Authority refused to confirm or deny that an investigation into the bakery sector was under way. But a source familiar with the probe told the Irish Mail on Sunday: ‘A number of bakeries were raided last week. Two fraud detectives based in the Competition Authority were backed up by gardaí from the computer section in the Bureau of Fraud Investigation.

‘Searches were carried out on each of the bakeries simultaneously. It was a painless enough exercise for all involved.’ However, one eyewitness to the raid on Brennan’s said that the swoop had shocked staff at the south Dublin depot.

He said: ‘Everyone looked shocked when the authorities arrived. They asked everyone their name and what they did at the company before allowing them to leave.’ The eyewitness said Mr Brennan was getting into his BMW to leave as the raid took place.

‘A detective asked him who he was and what he did. He said his name was Colm Brennan and he was the MD. They told him to stay where he was.’ Last week, the MoS approached Mr Brennan directly after his press officer chose not to respond to queries about the raid.

It was suggested to Mr Brennan that his bakery had been raided a day earlier by the Competition Authority. Mr Brennan replied: ‘No comment’. It was put to him that the raid had to do with an investigation into suspected price-fixing. Again he said: ‘No comment.’ Asked whether he would deny that an investigation was under way, he said: ‘I do not wish to make any comment.’ However, subsequent inquiries by the MoS established further details about the investigation.

Sources familiar with the inquiry said two Irish Pride bakeries had also been raided. On Friday, the MoS contacted Irish Pride asking it to comment. The spokesman immediately said: ‘I have no comment to make.’ Brennans was also contacted again but again made no comment.

Yesterday the MoS called to Mr Brennan’s luxurious south Co. Dublin home once again to give him another opportunity to put his firm’s side of events.

His grown-up daughter said: ‘Yeah, one second. Dad!’ She closed the door then re-emerged one minute later and said: ‘I am sorry, he’s actually not here.’ The Competition Authority is the watchdog that investigates allegations of price-fixing and the alleged running of cartels.

Asked about the investigation, an official spokesman for the authority said: ‘We never comment unless parties have spoken out in the public domain.’ Following an inquiry, the authority can submit a file to the DPP or launch its own prosecutions in the district court for lesser offences.

This is the second time in six months that Brennans Bread has hit the headlines. Last year, rival McCambridge successfully sought injunctions in the High Court to prevent Joseph Brennan Bakeries, trading as Brennans, confusing its customers by copying its packaging. Brennans is appealing the ruling.

Share This:

Northern Bank ‘money launderer’ may go free

This story was first published in the Irish Mail on Sunday on 11/03/2012

By: Michael O’Farrell
Investigations Editor

TED CUNNINGHAM – the only person jailed following the €31.4m Northern Bank robbery – looks set to be freed because of a Supreme Court ruling on the type of warrant used to search his house.

The Irish Mail on Sunday has learned that Mr Cunningham lodged a bail application last Thursday. He had already lodged appeal proceedings based largely on the warrant used, which were due to be heard within weeks.

Mr Cuningham was convicted after gardai investigating the robbery found more than £2.3m (€2.7m) in sterling bank notes in a locked basement cupboard.

His trial heard how Mr Cunningham had accompanied gardaí down to his basement where they asked what was in a locked cupboard visible in the room. He replied: ‘A couple of million sterling.’ ‘That money is not from the Northern Bank robbery,’ he added, before explaining that the funds were from the sale of a sand pit.

Mr Cunningham later claimed that he had been set up by gardaí. The claim was rejected and he was convicted and jailed for ten years.

However a Supreme Court decision last week found that the search warrant used to conduct the search is unconstitutional.

The warrant in question, a section 29 warrant, was introduced in 1976 to allow senior gardaí to authorise an emergency search without recourse to an independent judge.

Now this Garda self-issue warrant has been found to be ‘repugnant’ to the Constitution by the courts, because it allows gardaí to override the protection the Constitution affords to the home.

The ruling opens the door for the quashing of any pending and former convictions based on section 29 warrant searches.

Already this week a man being prosecuted for firearms offences walked free when the State dropped its case, apparently concerned over the warrant used in the case.

Senior barrister Paul McDermott has warned of a rising number of appeals based on the faulty warrant.

He told the MoS: ‘It’s very difficult to isolate the cases involved but I think they will be coming into the system quite soon.’ The DPP has begun a review of all serious crime files to establish how many major criminal prosecutions may collapse due to evidence obtained with section 29 warrants. It is not known exactly how many cases are affected.

In Mr Cunningham’s case, the DPP has not yet conceded anything and indicated last Thursday that it would oppose the bail application.

However, legal sources now believe that even if Mr Cunningham is not released prior to his appeal hearing, he is virtually certain of having his conviction quashed because much of the evidence against him was based on the controversial warrant.

The Northern Bank robbery – the largest bank heist ever in Ireland or England – is believed to have been carried out by the Provisional IRA on 20 December 2004.

During the ensuing investigation – led by then Detective Superintendent Tony Quilter – gardaí searched Mr Cunningham’s home under a warrant issued by Mr Quilter himself under Section 29.

During the search, on February 17 2005, they discovered the sterling bank notes in a locked basement cupboard.

Cunningham was arrested and the money was seized and used as evidence.

But last week’s Supreme Court judgement took exception to the fact that many section 29 warrants are authorised by senior gardaí who cannot be seen as independent in any way because they are directly involved in the investigation that the warrant is for.

This scenario applies to Mr Cunningham’s conviction because Mr Quilter, now an Assistant Commissioner, was the lead investigator into the Northern Bank raid when he authorised the search warrant.

The authorities were repeatedly warned as far back as 1998 by the Law Reform Commission and again at the Morris Tribunal about the need for warrants to be independent of investigating gardaí.

Will ‘monster’ get out too?

THE Section 29 warrants fiasco also applies to a tiger kidnapper serving 25 years for imprisoning a Securicor driver’s family – and who was described by a judge as an ‘inhuman monster’.

Mark Farrelly – who kidnapped the family during a multimillion euro heist – will also be able to challenge his conviction because gardaí used the now discredited warrant to obtain evidence during a search of his home.

Farrelly and his accomplices were jailed in November 2009 after they were found guilty of a €2.3m heist involving the kidnapping of mother Marie Richardson and her two teenage sons at their home in Raheny in March 2005.

Handing down sentence Judge Tony Hunt described the kidnappers as ‘inhuman monsters’ and praised the family’s courage.

Just as in the Ted Cunningham case, gardaí used a section 29 warrant to search Farrelly’s home.

There they found cable ties of the same type used to tie up the victims as well as five mobile phones and spare Sim cards.

This case is just one of many that might now be challenged and overturned following the new Supreme Court ruling.

Share This:

VHI spends €23m on healthcare for ex-staff

This story was first published in the Irish Mail on Sunday on 04/03/2012

By: Michael O’Farrell
Investigations Editor

THE State-owned VHI is to spend €23m on free health cover for staff past and present, including bosses who retired with massive pensions.

As thousands of ordinary people are forced to give up their VHI cover thanks to soaring premiums, the insurer admitted that anyone who joined the firm before 2002 will get free cover for life.

A VHI spokesman said the €23.7m represented an actuarial calculation ‘of the total future costs for providing this cover for the remainder of the retirees’ lives’.

Among those who qualify for the lavish benefit are ex-chief executive Vincent Sheridan, who had a salary of €455,000 for the last year of his tenure at the semi-state firm he led from 2001 to 2008.

Other executives who should qualify include all but one of VHI’s current senior management, most of whom are understood to earn over €200,000.

These include acting CEO Declan Moran, medical director Bernadette Carr, claims director John Creedon, corporate business director Tony McSweeney and HR director Michael Owens.

Both Mr Sheridan and VHI refuse to say who exactly received the lavish perk, or whether it also extends to their families.

For ordinary punters, VHI premiums are soaring: the cost of putting a family of two adults and two children onto its most popular plan, the One+ Plan, will be €2,250 per annum when the latest increase kicks in this month.

VHI has also started cutting a variety of procedures from many of its plans, including changing its criteria for allowing members access to Pet/CT scans used in the treatment of cancer.

Recent figures show that 65,000 people dropped their health insurance in 2011 – most of them, it is believed, due to soaring premiums. This weekend, VHI admitted that such concerns do not apply to current or retired permanent staff who began before June 2002.

Irish Mail on Sunday finance columnist Colm Rapple said the perk was ‘very unusual’. Many bluechip firms do provide health insurance cover for employees during their working lives but it is virtually unknown for the benefit to continue into retirement.

Since VHI’s retirement perk is ‘unfunded’, it is not provided for in the company’s pension fund and must be paid from VHI’s current operating expenses each year.

This means that millions of euro that otherwise might be available to help shore up the company’s reserves will instead go to well-off retirees.

The Government is studying a recent EU ruling which means it faces the prospect of contributing as much as €300m from the taxpayer to bring VHI’s cash reserves up to the level required of its competitors.

But the company, which is not subject to the Freedom of Information Act despite being entirely State-owned, refused to provide information that would have allowed the MoS to obtain an independent actuarial estimate. The information sought included the number of living employees qualifying for the benefit, the specific plans they are entitled to and whether spouses and families of retiring staff receive the perk too.

Former chief executive Vincent Sheridan refused to comment or indicate whether he was now in receipt of free health insurance.

‘I think that question should be answered by the company, not by me,’ he said when asked if he was in receipt of the perk.

VHI has dominated the supply of health insurance for decades and has 1.3m customers, more than half of all health insurance policy holders in the country.

While incomes are plummeting yet another VHI price hike of a further 9% will hit customers from the middle of this month. The cumulative increases mean that €300 has been added to the cost of insuring a family of two adults and two children since January 2011.

Price hikes aside, VHI has also been criticised for implementing a range of new punitive measures.

The firm now penalises people who cancel their policy midway through the year by charging a €50 administration fee and a percentage of that year’s insurance levy. Those who have chosen to stay with VHI but want to downgrade their policies also face new penalties.

VHI treats these clients as new customers – something that significantly reduces the level of cover for up to five years.

CEO Mr Moran said he was ‘acutely aware’ of the pressures facing customers but that the price hikes were essential to ‘ensure the organisation is sustainable’.

Share This:

Child hospital’s ex-boss begs Reilly: scrap Mater plan

This story was first published in the Irish Mail on Sunday on 26/02/2012

By: Michael O’Farrell
Investigations Editor

THE man originally tasked with building the National Children’s Hospital has pleaded with Health Minister James Reilly to abandon the controversial Mater site.

Prominent businessman Philip Lynch resigned as chairman of the National Paediatric Hospital Development Board in 2010 claiming the preferred location, in Bertie Ahern’s constituency, was being forced through for political reasons.

And last night Mr Lynch told the Irish Mail on Sunday that he believed the new €650m hospital will never be built on the Mater site despite Government suggestions that plans for a smaller building might now be pursued in the wake of this week’s planning rejection by An Bord Pleanála.

‘It’s a shame for the people of Ireland,’ he said. ‘It’s absolute and total blackguarding, what’s gone on.

‘No hospital is going to be built because I don’t believe the money is there to do it and this can is being kicked around this street for the last 15 years. Even in the boom it didn’t get done. It’s horrendous.’ Speaking exclusively to the MoS Mr Lynch said the hospital plan should be abandoned completely and replaced with a strategy to increase bed capacity at Our Lady’s Children’s Hospital in Crumlin.

‘Harness the people in Crumlin,’ he said. ‘Crumlin know what’s needed. They’re the people looking after all the sick kids. They’re the people with the knowledge and the know-how.’ And he lambasted those, such as former health minister Mary Harney who persisted with the northside location despite questions over its suitability.

‘Had we accepted this two years ago we would of course have had it built,’ he said. ‘But this site was imposed on us and there was no way back. We asked questions and I was pulled aside by the minister and the department because I asked the questions.

‘If the nose hadn’t been taken off the people on the board who were asking the questions we’d have got there three years ago.’ Now Mr Lynch is pleading with current Health Minister to ‘take politics out of it’. ‘There’s no need to run this thing over again, bringing in experts.’ Instead Mr Lynch is firm that a new accommodation block close to Crumlin hospital would be a perfect solution: it could be built quickly at fraction of the cost of the current proposal, he said.

‘All they need in Crumlin is decent accommodation. They have the theatres, they have the surgeons, they have the knowledge, the knowhow.

They have everything.

‘All they need is 300 beds near them to accommodate the sick kids and then they will be able to come from all over the country,’ he said.

Mr Lynch said he was appalled that more than a decade after the new children’s hospital was first mooted, the matter was still being mishandled by politicians and vested interests
ENDS

The story below was first published in the Irish Mail on Sunday on 04/03/2012

Revealed: Mater links of man in charge of NCH review
Doc advising on child hospital was Temple St boss favoured by Harney

By: Michael O’Farrell

THE new head of the Government task force advising on plans for a national children’s hospital is a medical professional with close links to the Mater Hospital.

Dr Frank Dolphin, the millionaire businessman who was appointed chair of the new review group last week, also has strong links with two of the most ardent supporters of the Mater Hospital site – Temple Street Children’s Hospital and former health minister Mary Harney.

Dr Dolphin was appointed as chairman of the HSE by Miss Harney, a post he held until August 2010. He was also chairman of Temple Street Children’s Hospital from 2008-10.

Last week An Bord Pleanála sensationappointed ally rejected the Governmentfavoured plan for the €650m project at the Mater site, leading to a scramble by health minister Dr James Reilly to announce the review group – with Dr Dolphin as its chairman. Dr Reilly said his primary concern was to select the best environment for children to get the best treatment.

‘Whether that happens at the Mater site or elsewhere is open to the review group to determine,’ he said as he insisted that the Government, while preferring the Mater site, was not ‘wedded’ to it.

But the Government’s choice of Dr Dolphin gives precisely the opposite impression.

Until August 2010 when he was as chairman of the HSE Dr Dolphin was a member of the board of governors of the Mater. He was also chairman of Temple Street Children’s Hospital, described this week as ‘long-term cheerleaders’ for the Mater site by former Fine Gael TD Ivan Yates.

Dr Dolphin, a chartered psychologist, was first appointed to the Temple Street board in April 2008, but gave up this position upon his appointment to the HSE. Temple Street was to be amalgamated with the new children’s hospital.

Because of these associations he is perceived to be closely affiliated to the Mater site, to the likely detriment of other possible locations. Moreover he is perceived to be close to Mary Harney, who championed the Mater site as health minister. She appointed Dr Dolphin, who owns call centre firm Rigney Dolphin, to the HSE.

Dr Dolphin’s appointment to the new review group was greeted with concern by the National Children’s Hospital Alliance.

‘Given the legacy of mistrust generated over the past five years it is essential that not even a perception of possible bias is allowable in this appointment, particularly as the minister has not ruled out the possibility of the children’s hospital being built at the Mater,’ said a NCHA spokesman.

‘NCHA believes that it is in the interests of the children of Ireland that Dr Dolphin graciously decline the post.’ But this week the Government reaffirmed the choice of Mr Dolphin, although the announcement of his terms of reference and fellow task force members will not be made until next week.

The review group will be given four weeks to complete its work and report back to the Cabinet.

In theory the rejection of the Mater site means that alternative locations are back on the agenda.

Possible alternatives include colocation at Tallaght Hospital or James Connolly in Blanchardstown, a new standalone paediatric centre at Newlands Cross, or the redevelopment of either St James’ or Crumlin Children’s Hospital.

Speaking to the MoS last week Philip Lynch – the man formerly charged with choosing the site – pleaded with the Government to abandon the Mater plan.

Mr Lynch resigned as Chairman of the National Paediatric Hospital Development Board in October 2010 claiming the preferred location, in the heart of Bertie Ahern’s constituency, was being forced through for political reasons.

‘It’s a shame for the people of Ireland. It’s absolute and total blackguarding what’s gone on’, he said. ‘No hospital is going to be built because I don’t believe the money is there to do it and this can is being kicked around this street for the last 15 years. Even in the boom it didn’t get done.’ On Friday a new proposal, to build the new hospital on a site near the Coombe, was sent to Dr Reilly.

The proposal, prepared by The Coombe Women & Infants University Hospital, showed how a seven-storey building could be accommodated on the site with parking for 1,000 cars, and that it could be built within 3½ years.

It came as yesterday two leading experts on paediatric care poured scorn on the notion of locating the hospital on the Mater site.

In a letter to The Irish Times, paediatrician Prof Alf Nicholson and neo-natologist Dr John Murphy wrote: ‘The best care for sick children has come into conflict with the finer points of planning.’ They add: ‘A single tertiary pediatric hospital is the only solution; it should be co-located with an adult teaching hospital and adjacent to a maternity hospital – research and education are not optional extras.’ A spokesman for Dr Reilly said Dr Dolphin is an ‘ideal choice’.

‘With his experience, both the area of paediatric hospitals and of the wider health services, he is an ideal choice,’ he said.

‘It is important for people to remember that Minister Reilly has asked Dr Dolphin to chair an expert group to review the decision of An Bord Pleanála. He has not been asked to chair a group to decide the location of the Children’s Hospital.
ENDS

Share This:

CJ Haughey’s son ends up in NAMA

This story was first published in the Irish Mail on Sunday on 12/02/2012

By Michael O’Farrell
Investigations Editor

TO GENERATIONS of Irish people, the name Haughey has been synonymous with controversial and scandalous money matters thanks to the notorious financial affairs of family patriarch and former taoiseach Charles Haughey.

But today, the Irish Mail on Sunday can reveal a new chapter in the family saga as we disclose that a multimillion-euro loan related to the helicopter business of his son, Ciarán, has been taken over by NAMA.

The ex-taoiseach may have been able to have his own bank debts quietly swept under the carpet for much of his indulged and corrupt life but the company set up by his son – which was used to funnel €600,000 to his father – has now landed the family name in the ‘toxic bank’.

The loan in question is related to Medeva Properties Ltd, a firm jointly owned by Ciarán Haughey and John Barnicle, a Vietnam War helicopter pilot. Now though, in an unfortunate twist of fate, his business dealings with Mr Haughey have crashed to earth.

Medeva has close connections to Celtic Helicopters, which was set up by Mr Haughey in 1985 and has featured extensively in various tribunal inquiries into payments to his father.

Mr Haughey and Mr Barnicle are fellow directors of both firms and Celtic Helicopters is part-owned by Medeva. Other shareholders in Celtic Helicopters include Larchfield Securities – the Haughey family firm that controls assets such as the island of Inishvickillaune off the Kerry coast as well as seaside properties in Co. Wexford.

The MoS has discovered that Medeva’s NAMA loan is a €3m Irish Nationwide advance secured against the land and aircraft hangers at the Celtic Helicopters headquarters in Knocksedan near Dublin Airport.

Only the largest of the 850 property developers whose loans have been taken over by NAMA are directly managed by the agency itself.

The Knocksedan heliport is the only property registered to Medeva and land registry documents reveal several back-to-back Irish Nationwide loans secured against the asset.

The first Irish Nationwide loan is dated February 1996, when Medeva bought the land from Celtic Helicopters with the intention of renting the hangers and facilities out.

But the initial loan is followed by seven further advances from Irish Nationwide, which increased in frequency between 2000 and 2008.

In all, company documents reveal that Medeva has seven outstanding mortgages with Irish Nationwide, many of them for helicopters.

The latest accounts for Medeva, filed to the Company Registrations Office just this week, reveal that the company had a bank loan of €3.1m in 2011, the balance of which had increased by more than €100,000 from the previous year rather than being reduced by repayments. Meanwhile, the accounts value the company’s property asset at less than €2m.

When approached by the MoS at his Malahide home this week, Mr Barnicle admitted that the debt had been taken over by NAMA.

Mr Barnicle said: ‘That’s because the whole bank was taken in. Either you had a loan or you didn’t. If you were in Irish Nationwide, regardless of if you were making repayments or not, NAMA had it.’ However, when he was asked if the company had defaulted or missed payments on the loan, meaning it could face enforcement by NAMA, he admitted that it had. Asked whether Medeva was still in default and would be able to pay the loan back, Mr Barnicle said it depended on how things went.

When asked how things were going for Medeva, he replied: ‘Same as everything else in the country at the moment.’ The situation at Celtic Helicopters appears no better. The company has failed to file accounts for more than a year and Mr Haughey and Barnicle have received enforcement warnings from the Company Registrations Office.

A spokesman for the CRO said: ‘They have had notices from our enforcement section and they are following up on that at the moment. They are open to prosecution and strikeoff if they don’t file.’ Celtic Helicopters did attempt to file an annual return on January 26 but that was sent back as it was deemed to be not in order.

The MoS made several attempts to speak to Mr Haughey about the NAMA loan and other matters at his palatial home in Kinsealy, Co. Dublin, and his place of work, as well as through emails and phone messages to colleagues at Celtic Helicopters.

He did not respond to any of these approaches.

Mr Haughey’s journey into NAMA is merely the latest twist in a frequently controversial business career dominated and overshadowed from the very beginning by his late father.

During the recession of the Eighties, it was joked that the best way to get a job was to be the taoiseach’s son.

In 1985 when, at the age of 25, Ciarán Haughey wanted to establish Celtic Helicopters, it was his father’s bagman, Des Traynor, who stepped up to the mark to help him out.

The result was that the first two loans the company received came from Guinness & Mahon Ltd and Ansbacher Ltd, which would feature endlessly as the McCracken and Moriarty Tribunals investigated payments to Charles Haughey.

The initial capital for Celtic Helicopters was a combination of £80,000 collected by Des Traynor, who ran the Guinness & Mahon private bank, and a loan from Guinness & Mahon itself.

Some £50,000 of this was found to have been transferred through the now notorious Cayman Islands Ansbacher account. When the company found itself in dire financial straits in the early Nineties, a further £290,000 was raised by Mr Traynor.

This money was contributed by a number of businessmen, including Xavier McAuliffe, a Fianna Fáil supporter who two years ago was awarded the lucrative contract to roll out speed detector vans across the country.

The tribunals would also uncover other instances of businessmen going out of their way to help in order to keep on good terms with Charles Haughey.

For example, Mike Murphy, of Mike Murphy Insurance Brokers, organised a loan to help Celtic Helicopters pay for the insurance he was providing – then proceeded to pay off the loan himself. The Moriarty Tribunal found that Mr Murphy’s actions had been motivated by his ‘desire not to fall foul of what was perceived to be Mr Haughey’s enormous power’.

It added: ‘The payment was on the face of it the straightforward discharge of a debt owed by a company, Celtic Helicopters, associated with Mr Haughey.

‘Mr Murphy emphasised that he did not want to have made an enemy of the son of the most powerful man in the State; that the risk to which his own business might be exposed in the event of Mr Haughey’s son’s business failing.’ In all, Charles Haughey was found to have received indirect payments of more then £600,000 through his son’s helicopter company.

The tribunal also found that Charles Haughey ‘had used Celtic Helicopters as a vehicle for the transmission of other funds, in themselves unrelated to Celtic Helicopters, so as to enable them to be applied to his own use, while removing traces of the identity of the providers of the funds’.

There would be other skirmishes between Ciarán Haughey and the tribunals.

In 2006, the Mahon Tribunal criticised him and Mr Barnicle for failing to tell the inquiry that a significant amount of the proceeds from the sale of a share in a land holding near Dublin Airport had been transferred to the Isle of Man.

A lot of money had been spent ‘wandering around the globe trying to work out where the money had gone’, complained tribunal chairman Alan Mahon when Haughey Jr and Barnicle retracted evidence.

The pair had originally told the tribunal that the proceeds for the sale of the lands owned by a consortium called Cargobridge, which the tribunal was investigating, had gone to Ben Dunne.

But they later changed their evidence and conceded that Medeva had received, via an Isle of Man account, most of the proceeds.

That same year, Celtic Helicopters made a settlement of almost €700,000 with the Revenue Commissioners.

The payment was made after it emerged the company had under declared its VAT when it was audited by the Revenue.

Celtic Helicopters was found to owe tax of €333,989 and had to pay interest and penalties of €355,956. The total settlement was €689,945.

But despite mounting debts at his companies and the pressure of paying off tax settlements, Mr Haughey showed no outward signs of financial stress in recent years.

In 2007, he applied for planning permission to Fingal County Council to renovate and extend his home extensively, adding a new recreation room, conservatory and threecar garage.

That same year, on September 13, he bought a Fifth Avenue apartment in New York. Documents obtained by the MoS reveal Mr Haughey used a $765,000 (€580,000) Anglo Irish Bank loan to buy the $969,000 property.

The one-bedroom apartment in the Grand Madison building is now worth $765,000.

In his early days, Ciarán Haughey’s business woes were eclipsed by his father’s scandals.

Now he is on the radar of our ‘toxic bank’… all thanks to his controversial chopper firm

‘Nama took you over if you were in Irish Nationwide”They are open to prosecution”Didn’t want to make an enemy of powerful man’

ENDS

Share This:

GARDAI PROBE SECOND FF TD’S PHONE CLAIMS

This Story was first published in the Irish Mail on Sunday on 29/01/2012

By: Michael O’Farrell
Investigations Editor

A second former Fianna Fáil minister is under investigation over allegations of mobile-phone expenses fraud, the Irish Mail on Sunday can reveal.

Fraud squad detectives are formally investigating a series of allegedly bogus expense claims submitted by former TD and junior minister Ned O’Keeffe.

The investigation by officers at the Garda Bureau of Fraud Investigation has been running in tandem with the separate probe into the expense claims of Ivor Callely, the former TD, junior minister and senator.

Mr Callely was arrested and released without charge this week and a file was sent to the DPP. The investigation was sparked by MoS revelations in August 2010 that Mr Callely had claimed almost €3,000 in mobile phone expenses using receipts that could not be genuine.

The controversial former minister later accepted that the receipts were bogus but insists he is innocent and that somebody else was responsible for the fakes. If he is charged and convicted, he could face up to 10 years in jail for obtaining money using a ‘false instrument’.

Weeks after the Callely exposé, the MoS revealed that his Fianna Fáil colleague Mr O’Keeffe had also claimed over €2,200 in mobile-phone expenses using receipts that could not be genuine.

However, while Senator Callely’s bogus claims were immediately looked into by the Oireachtas authorities – who then passed the matter on to gardaí and the DPP – Leinster House officials took no action against Mr O’Keeffe.

Despite being made aware of the evidence against Mr O’Keeffe, the Oireachtas authorities – headed by Dáil Clerk Kieran Coughlan – have never investigated. Mr Coughlan himself has repeatedly insisted that the expenses were legitimate and that there was no question of a bogus invoice being submitted or accepted.

Mr Coughlan allowed Mr O’Keeffe to submit fresh paperwork ‘correcting’ the information in one disputed invoice – and has ever since insisted the claim was ‘properly made’.

This stance seems to contradict the view taken by gardaí, who appear to believe the claimed €737 from the Oireachtas former minister has questions to answer. WHICH r Six months after our revelations, Mr O’Keeffe retired when the general election was called in February 2011. DAIL n However, a Garda investigation into Mr O’Keeffe’s expenses was formally launched THE Irish Mail on Sunday today reveals how a high-profile TD has been allowed to make a string of bogus expenses claims – even though the Dáil authorities have been repeatedly told that they are based on fake invoices.Kieran Coughlan, who is Clerk of Dáil, was made aware last year that the Fianna Fáil TD Ned O’Keeffe, who has since retired, had made three bo-gus claims for mobile phone expenses totalling thousands of euro.Mr Coughlan is the most powerful civil servant in the Oireachtas: he responsible for all its staff – and for office which approves TDs’ expenses. However, Mr Coughlan never instigated any probe into Deputy O’Keeffe’s bogus claims – or why staff working for him had paid sums to the Deputy on the basis of fake invoices.Eventually, a concerned member ed ft in September 2011 after our evidence was handed over to GBFI detectives.

The dossier includes three invoices that Mr O’Keeffe submitted to claim €2,237.53 in expenses from the Oireachtas.

The invoices were all on headed note paper apparently from TR Motor Services Ltd – a respected Mercedes dealership in Harold’s Cross, south Dublin.

Mr O’Keeffe’s invoices were not questioned by the Dáil authorities and he was paid the full amount on the invoices.

But as soon as the MoS saw the three receipts, a number of irregularities were immediately apparent.

One issue was that the invoices appeared to have been printed on standard headed paper. When the MoS obtained a genuine invoice from TR Motor S i it k dl Services, it was markedly different to the amateurish versions submitted by Mr O’Keeffe.

The documents provided to the Oireachtas by Mr O’Keeffe also had no invoice numbers: a TR Motors accounts employee insisted that all the firm’s invoices carry such a number.

In addition, just one of the invoices bore a VAT number – another standard feature of any legitimate sales docket.

Moreover, all of the invoices had charged VAT at the incorrect rate of 13.5%. The Revenue confirmed to the MoS that the correct VAT rate for installing mobile phone kits at the time was 21%.

But possibly the most glaring aspect of the invoices was the amount involved, which seemed impossibly high for the goods and services listed.

For example, one of the invoices bills €330 in labour charges even though no labour is required to install the component listed.

Crucially, the MoS also established that TR Motors’ own accounts did not show the firm having received all of the payments claimed by Mr O’Keeffe.

Mr O’Keeffe has always insisted the invoices are genuine and that he got them ‘free and fair’.

Share This:

Gayle banks €4m on Swiss apartment sale

This article was first published in the Irish Mail on Sunday on 23/01/2011

By: Michael O’Farrell
Investigations Editor

CONTROVERSIAL society beauty Gayle Killilea made at least €2m after selling a Swiss apartment that had been gifted to her by developer husband Seán Dunne, the Irish Mail on Sunday can reveal.

And amid growing questions over the source of her new-found personal wealth, the MoS has discovered that she was able to bank more than 5 million Swiss francs from the property deal in Geneva.

Until now, nobody even knew that the couple had been living in a suburb of Geneva between 2008 and 2010, at which point they moved to the US.

Thanks to Switzerland’s privacy laws, which are almost as strict as the laws regarding the famously secret Swiss bank accounts, their decision to move there as the Irish property market began to crumble passed unnoticed.

But property sales and purchases do have to be registered – and the MoS has been able to establish a chain of events showing how the couple bought the apartment together before Seán gave it to his wife – and she then sold it at a profit.

The Dunnes bought their apartment in Switzerland together in the summer of 2008 and are listed as having paid 4,650,000 Swiss francs for it (almost €3.6m).

The luxury ground-floor property, which includes an underground parking space and a wine cellar, is in the Chêne-Bougeries area of Geneva, just a short drive from the shores of Lake Geneva.

It is around the corner from the city’s famous yacht club and offers easy access to the snow-peaked ski resorts surrounding the city.

Other residents of the modern, gated community include several of Switzerland’s most successful businessmen and bankers.

Mr Dunne transferred the property into his wife’s name last March, when Nama was preparing to take over his bad loans.

Gayle Killilea sold the Swiss property at a profit, just days before she bought a $2m house in an upmarket estate in Greenwich, Connecticut, through a secretive trust.

The transaction could explain how the former gossip columnist could afford her new life in America.

In addition to her purchase of the Greenwich house, she has set herself up as a property developer with at least $500,000 available to invest.

While waiting for construction work on her new home to be competed, she is renting a $17,500-amonth mansion to live in.

As revealed in a recent high-profile court row with her immigration lawyer, she also claims to have ‘other funds… currently in an investment portfolio that is performing well’.

Now the MoS can reveal the multimillion-euro Swiss transaction almost certainly explains how Miss Killilea acquired part of that fortune.

The reasons for the couple’s 18-month sojourn in Geneva remains a mystery, however, since Swiss commercial registers have no record of any company belonging to Seán Dunne or Gayle Killilea.

It is also impossible to establish what, if any, bank accounts the pair may have in Switzerland.

Apart from the property records, the only official record of Mr Dunne in the city is his residency permit and a published notice requesting that he attend the regional motor and driving office to be informed of an unspecified decision about him last April.

Although they have departed the country, the Dunnes are still officially registered as Swiss residents at their old address.

‘If someone leaves the country, they are supposed to inform us o f this residency change,’ said a local government official. ‘As far as we are concerned, they still live here.’

Despite their departure from Switzerland, transactions involving their Geneva apartment appear to be central to their controversial move to the US last spring.

Although the Geneva apartment was originally listed in both of the couple’s names, official records in Geneva show Mr Dunne signed his half of the property over to his wife at the beginning of 2010, making her the sole owner.

Swiss records indicate that Miss Killilea was officially registered as the sole owner of the home on February 1, 2010. Just six weeks later, on March 11, 2010, she signed a contract to sell the home to Francis Kahn, heir to a Swiss banking fortune.

Mr Kahn declined to comment when approached by the MoS but confirmed he had purchaseD the apartment from Miss Killilea.

Mr Kahn said: ‘I know nothing about Seán Dunne. He has nothing to do with me.’

Records of the purchase reveal that Mr Kahn paid 5,300,000 Swiss francs (almost €4.1m) to Miss Killilea – half of which would have belonged to Mr Dunne were it not for his generous gift to her the previous month.

Then, as we exclusively revealed in the MoS last month, Miss Killilea signed a €2m contract on March 29 for the purchase of No.38 Bush Avenue in Greenwich, Connecticut.

Mr Dunne declined to answer any questions this weekend about whether the Geneva and US transactions are linked. He also declined to answer questions about whether his transfer of Swiss property to his wife was an effort to hide his assets from Nama.

Mr Dunne has, however, acknowledged being in Nama, which is understood to have taken over some of his loans last June.
ENDS

Share This: